02 · Denials

Who says no, and what happens next

7,350,316 standard requests were denied across the 523 filings that publish counts (of 658), a 11.0% rateⓘ. Four ways to read that number: whether urgent requests fare better or worse and how long decisions take, who issued the denials, whether size changes the rate, and how many denials were ever tested on appeal.

Market
01 · Urgent requests and the clock

When the request is urgent

Expedited requests are the ones a doctor marked as time-critical, and the rule puts a clock on both kinds of decisionⓘ. Four pictures of what payers published against it: how long standard and expedited decisions actually take, whether urgent requests are denied more often than routine ones, and whether a filing's own mean and median tell the same story.

177
of 424 filings deny expedited requests more often than standard ones
22
publish a standard mean over 7 days the filings
13
publish an expedited mean over 72 hours the filings
220
publish a mean more than three times their own median, or the reverseⓘ
Standard decisions click a bar for its filings
Published mean time to decision, against the 7-day clock · 629 filings publish one
68
190
102
186
61
22
0–1
1–2
2–3
3–5
5–7
over 7
days; the orange bar is past the clock.
Expedited decisions click a bar for its filings
Published mean time to decision, against the 72-hour clock · 585 filings publish one
146
73
87
223
43
13
0–6
6–12
12–24
24–48
48–72
over 72
hours; the orange bar is past the clock.
Urgent against routine, 424 filings with 100+ expedited requests click a point for the filing
Standard denial rate across, expedited denial rate up, both to 60%. The dashed line is where the two agree; every point above it is a plan that says no more often when the doctor said it was urgent.
015%30%45%60% standard denial rate
● 177 deny urgent requests more often ● 247 deny them less often
Standard: mean against median click a point for the filing
The two figures a filing publishes for the same standard decisions. Median across, mean up, both on a log scale. On the dashed line the two agree; far from it, one filing's two figures do not.
the clock — 7 days, both axes
0110100 days
● mean past the clock ● mean and median three times apart ● 615 filings publish both ● 176 published a zero — drawn on the axis
Expedited: mean against median click a point for the filing
The two figures a filing publishes for the same expedited decisions. Median across, mean up, both on a log scale. On the dashed line the two agree; far from it, one filing's two figures do not.
the clock — 72 hours, both axes
01101001000 hours
● mean past the clock ● mean and median three times apart ● 583 filings publish both ● 230 published a zero — drawn on the axis

The filings behind the charts

Expedited denied more often than standard, the widest gaps

Plan
Organization
Standard
Expedited
Std mean · median
Exp mean · median
Gap
Humana Healthy Horizons in South Carolina Medicaid Managed Care
Humana
10.9%
59.4%
3.0 · 2.0 d
10.0 · 8.0 h
+48.6 pts
Humana Healthy Horizons in Oklahoma Medicaid Managed Care
Humana
8.5%
55.4%
1.0 · 1.0 d
7.0 · 4.0 h
+46.8 pts
Johns Hopkins Advantage MD (PPO) - Contract H3890 Medicare Advantage
Johns Hopkins Medicine
14.7%
58.4%
3.0 · 1.0 d
— · —
+43.7 pts
Johns Hopkins Advantage MD (HMO) - Contract H1225 Medicare Advantage
Johns Hopkins Medicine
16.1%
56.3%
4.0 · 1.0 d
— · —
+40.3 pts
Humana Healthy Horizons in Florida Medicaid Managed Care
Humana
2.6%
40.9%
1.0 · 1.0 d
13.0 · 3.0 h
+38.3 pts
UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage - Contract H3794 Medicare Advantage
UnitedHealth Group
11.9%
44.9%
0.0 · 1.2 d
0.0 · 19.2 h
+33.0 pts
UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage - Contract H7464 Medicare Advantage
UnitedHealth Group
11.9%
38.1%
1.0 · 2.1 d
0.0 · 12.0 h
+26.3 pts
Humana Healthy Horizons in Louisiana Medicaid Managed Care
Humana
4.9%
30.5%
2.0 · 1.0 d
7.0 · 3.0 h
+25.6 pts
Humana Healthy Horizons in Virginia Medicaid Managed Care
Humana
11.7%
35.7%
3.1 · 1.0 d
20.4 · 4.1 h
+24.1 pts
Arizona Long Term Care Medicaid Managed Care
UnitedHealth Group
4.6%
28.4%
1.0 · 29.7 d
24.0 · 21.6 h
+23.8 pts
UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage - Contract H3387 Medicare Advantage
UnitedHealth Group
11.5%
34.2%
0.0 · 1.4 d
0.0 · 9.6 h
+22.7 pts
Medicaid Managed Care Medicaid Managed Care
Healthfirst
19.7%
40.5%
1.6 · 0.0 d
— · —
+20.8 pts

Against the clock, and against themselves

Plan
Organization
Standard
Expedited
Std mean · median
Exp mean · median
Flag
Community Health Choice CHIP & CHIP Perinatal (combined) CHIP Managed Care
Community Health Choice
—
—
9.0 · 3.0 d
288.0 · 72.0 h
standard mean over 7 days
expedited mean over 72 hours
mean and median three times apart
VillageCareMAX Managed Long-Term Care Medicaid Managed Care
VillageCare
—
—
7.3 · 5.0 d
92.6 · 24.0 h
standard mean over 7 days
expedited mean over 72 hours
mean and median three times apart
Mississippi Medicaid Fee-for-Service Medicaid FFS
Mississippi Division of Medicaid
—
—
3.1 · 1.0 d
110.3 · 27.0 h
expedited mean over 72 hours
mean and median three times apart
mean and median three times apart
Colorado Access Medicaid Managed Care
Colorado Access
—
—
21.1 · 1.9 d
3.0 · 1.0 h
standard mean over 7 days
mean and median three times apart
Umpqua Health Alliance Medicaid Managed Care
Umpqua Health
—
—
9.1 · 7.0 d
81.6 · 0.0 h
standard mean over 7 days
expedited mean over 72 hours
California Children's Services (CCS) Medicaid FFS
California DHCS
—
—
9.0 · 2.0 d
— · —
standard mean over 7 days
mean and median three times apart
Hamaspik Choice (MLTC) Medicaid Managed Care
Hamaspik
—
—
7.6 · 4.3 d
101.3 · 61.4 h
standard mean over 7 days
expedited mean over 72 hours
Mass General Brigham Advantage Secure HMO-POS Medicare Advantage
Mass General Brigham
—
—
7.3 · 1.0 d
36.0 · 30.0 h
standard mean over 7 days
mean and median three times apart
Humana Healthy Horizons in Indiana Medicaid Managed Care
Humana
—
—
4.0 · 1.0 d
47.0 · 11.0 h
mean and median three times apart
mean and median three times apart
AZ Blue Health Choice (AHCCCS) Medicaid Managed Care
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona
—
—
4.0 · 1.1 d
16.1 · 2.8 h
mean and median three times apart
mean and median three times apart
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest Medicare Advantage
Kaiser Permanente
—
—
3.7 · 0.8 d
14.0 · 1.0 h
mean and median three times apart
mean and median three times apart
Individual Affordable Care Act Plan Members Marketplace QHP
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona
—
—
3.5 · 0.3 d
20.4 · 2.9 h
mean and median three times apart
mean and median three times apart
02 · Who denies the most

Organizations, by denials issued

Standard denials summed across every filing the organization published that carries counts. The rate beside each is that organization's own volume-weighted rate.

Plans with the most denials

Denial rate by stateⓘ

click a state for its filings
Alaska: 2.1%Alabama: 28.5%Arkansas: 19.1%Arizona: 17.6%California: 8.4%Colorado: 21.5%Connecticut: 4.8%District of Columbia: 17.8%Delaware: 18.5%Florida: 11.1%Georgia: 14.2%Hawaii: 5.9%Iowa: 12.9%Idaho: 0.7%Illinois: 16.6%Indiana: 7.0%Kansas: 12.6%Kentucky: 14.3%Louisiana: 14.8%Massachusetts: 11.0%Maryland: 10.6%Maine: 6.4%Michigan: 20.1%Minnesota: 33.0%Missouri: 19.6%Mississippi: 16.0%Montana: not publishedNorth Carolina: 11.0%North Dakota: 22.4%Nebraska: 14.9%New Hampshire: 16.8%New Jersey: 5.0%New Mexico: 8.1%Nevada: not publishedNew York: 13.4%Ohio: 16.9%Oklahoma: 19.0%Oregon: 11.6%Pennsylvania: 17.8%Rhode Island: 5.8%South Carolina: 21.3%South Dakota: 14.6%Tennessee: 14.7%Texas: 17.5%Utah: 2.8%Virginia: 18.2%Vermont: not publishedWashington: 9.7%Wisconsin: 8.2%West Virginia: 16.4%Wyoming: 4.1%
≤ 7.0%7.0% – 12.6%12.6% – 16.0%16.0% – 18.5%> 18.5%not published
03 · Scale and scrutiny

Does a bigger plan say no more often?

Every filing with 100 or more standard requests: request volume across (log scale), denial rate up, coloured by market. A plan far above its neighbours of the same size and market is the one to read.

Denial rate against request volume, 516 filings click a point for the filing
1001K10K100K1M requests
● Medicare Advantage● Medicaid Managed Care● Medicaid FFS● Marketplace QHP● CHIP
Median rate by market and size bandⓘ
Medicaid Managed Care 100–1K 15.6% 2
Medicaid Managed Care 1K–10K 11.3% 28
Medicaid Managed Care 10K–100K 12.1% 99
Medicaid Managed Care 100K+ 14.9% 52
Medicaid FFS 1K–10K 5.2% 2
Medicaid FFS 10K–100K 10.3% 8
Medicaid FFS 100K+ 6.4% 11
CHIP Managed Care 100–1K 9.0% 6
CHIP Managed Care 1K–10K 16.6% 11
CHIP Managed Care 10K–100K 14.5% 3
Medicare Advantage 100–1K 9.2% 25
Medicare Advantage 1K–10K 10.0% 49
Medicare Advantage 10K–100K 11.9% 99
Medicare Advantage 100K+ 7.8% 51
Marketplace QHP 100–1K 15.9% 2
Marketplace QHP 1K–10K 12.2% 13
Marketplace QHP 10K–100K 22.0% 25
Marketplace QHP 100K+ 9.8% 7
Unclassified 1K–10K 22.4% 2
Unclassified 10K–100K 17.7% 7
Unclassified 100K+ 18.2% 1
Multiple (combined) 10K–100K 6.3% 2
Multiple (combined) 100K+ 9.9% 1
Medicare-Medicaid Plan 100–1K 40.4% 1
Medicare-Medicaid Plan 1K–10K 4.5% 1
Medicare-Medicaid Plan 10K–100K 7.2% 7
Medicare-Medicaid Plan 100K+ 7.0% 1

Highest for their sizeⓘ

04 · The appeal gap

Most denials are never tested

Among filings that publish appeal counts (365 of them), 64.0% of standard denials were appealedⓘ, and 3.7% of those appeals overturned the denial. An overturn rate describes the denials someone fought; the denials nobody fought are the larger number, and it is listed here.

5.6M
standard denials in filings that report appeals the filings
3.6M
appeals filed · 64.0% of denials
3.7%
of appeals overturned the denial
2.0M
denials never appealedⓘ

Everything on this page is computed from the published counts in the filings; the plan pages show the source document for each figure. Where a plan published a rate without counts it cannot appear here, because a rate nobody can check is not a number of denials.